Choosing a President

Latest headlines

On Politics

A weekly political column by veteran reporter Lee Bandy

Brad Warthen's Blog

Latest from Brad on the elections

Staff Directory

« Lawmakers push for climate change debate | Main | Sanford rips Senate budget »

24 April 2007

Dems differ on how to spend cig tax revenues

House Democrats are eyeing different uses for money generated by a proposed cigarette tax increase.

While some Democrats are expected to oppose the 30 cents a pack increase that won initial approval last week in the House Ways and Means Committee, most are likely to support a hike. 

At issue is how proceeds from the tax will be spent.

As the bill currently is written, a majority, but not all of the money raised by a new tax, would be used to improve health care for low income residents under the Medicaid program. That has been a longstanding goal of state Democrats.

"If we pass a cigarette tax, a majority of it should go to health care," said Democratic Majority Leader Harry Ott, D-Orangeburg.

Ott said amendments to the cigarette tax bill, which is expected to reach the floor for debate on Wednesday, may diminish or phase-out health care in the bill and direct more proceeds to eliminating the food tax. Ott said proposals may also surface to phase in the tax over 3 years.

"First of all,  I don't think we need the money," said Rep. Herb Kirsch, D-York. "If we get it, all we're going to do is spend it."

The bill is designed to extend health care to working Medicaid recipients who are at 100 percent of poverty, instead of the current 50 percent. Ott said Democrats were to be polled for their support of the bill later today.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/675233/17972698

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Dems differ on how to spend cig tax revenues:

Comments

cig tax going to healthcare...ironic, but makes sense i suppose

Kirsch says we don't need the money. What is he thinking, or is he? He and his cohorts are cuting the budget in key areas because there is a revenue shortfall, and we don't need the money?

Post a comment

-->

Presidential Candidates